Beyond Quantitative Easing 0-1-2-3∞ & The Federal Reserve’s Love Affair: Is It Really Over?

The End of the Age of America, 2016-2017; The Age of China and Asia

Voodoo Figure 4. The End of the Age of America

Emerging and developing economies have grown to account for about two-thirds of the world’s central bank holdings of foreign exchange reserves as their relative holdings of U.S. dollars have quietly gone in the opposite direction…  Increasingly, bi-lateral trade agreements among other nations exclude the use of the U.S. dollar as payment for international trade, once the domain of the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency. Other countries see what is unfolding in this country but it is unclear if the American public sees it. — Quantitative Easing 0-1-2-3∞ & The Federal Reserve’s Love Affair with its Banks and Mortgage Bonds: Levitating The Black Hole (Oct. 22, 2012)

These developments can be seen in Figure 1, as China is the primary driver of the group of emerging and developing (E & D) economies. Government central bank foreign exchange reserves (Forex), also call official international reserves, consist of foreign cash and bonds. In this context, think of Forex reserves as a component of a country’s ‘savings’ from production; part of the composition of savings are the currencies central banks hold, U.S. dollars being the world reserve currency, and to a lesser degree euros, yen, and pound sterling. The size of the Forex reserve and its composition of currencies may give an indication of a country’s growth and weighting of its import-export production, savings or indebtedness, its ability to influence exchange rates or confidence about currencies.

Decline in U.S. Dollar & Treasury Holdings among Central Banks, 1995-2012

Voodoo Figure 1. Decline in U.S. Dollar & Treasury Holdings among Central Banks, 1995-2012

In just eight years from about 2000 to 2008, China in leading the E&D economies, nearly doubled its share of global central bank foreign currency reserves to now hold two-thirds of the world’s currency reserves ‘savings’ as seen in Voodoo Figure 1. In the U.S. by 2008, the worst banking and financial collapse in a century (perhaps a few) continues to unfold. From 1995 to 2012,

  • China and the E&D economies reduced relative holdings of U.S. dollars by about half (slightly over 40% to 20%) quietly over the past 18 years, but a striking difference is
  • advanced economies held on at about 60% of its Forex in U.S. dollars (not shown in the chart) as its share of global foreign currency reserves plunged from two-thirds to about one-third.

Let’s look at what is behind these rapid shifts from the two countries leading these changes, shown in Figure 1 to Figure 2. An important determinant of the increase in central bank foreign reserves is driven by the country’s productivity, so we look at trade. Countries trade in both goods and services but the focus is on manufacturing as the value of manufacturing goods accounts for over two-thirds of U.S. and over 90% of China’s exports in 2011.  From the available data in Figure 2, for about 25 years China’s share of world manufacturing output appear dormant until about 1995, when it began to rise to match its growing share of global central bank Forex reserves (more detail in Figure 3).

The Western Derivatives Decade: Decline of U.S. Manufacturing as China Rises

Voodoo Figure 2. The Decade of Financial Derivatives of the Largest Member Banks of the Federal Reserve System: The Rise of China. The derivatives data from ISDA (IRS, CDS, currency swaps) is for illustration purposes and is incomplete, as there are over $1,000 trillion in notional derivatives outstanding. Following the collapse in 2008, there was a re-valuation of derivatives by the IMF and BIS and similarly a change in the valuation of bank balance sheets by FASB’s suspension of mark-to-market rule in 2009. QE & The Federal Reserve’s Love Affair showed the effects of FASB. Derivatives are financial contract instruments based on or whose value is ‘derived’ from the underlying value of an asset, at least that is the definition.

Continue reading

Welcome to Economics Voodoo!

It was not long ago in fall 2010 that I was a senior congressional staffer financial economist at the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) when I was fired after 2 ½ months for writing about the damage from the banking and financial system collapse since fall 2008. The writings included ‘robo-signing’ foreclosures as symptomatic of deeper problems in the securitization of $7 trillion mortgage bonds that CBO denied was a problem and the condition of the nation’s banks.

I was told that CBO should take the lead in treating foreclosure problems as “the kind of event of the moment where we should be adding skepticism, not just repeating the hype in the press”  and my writing about it showed “poor judgment about what is important and what isn’t.” This came from my direct report, then-CBO assistant director and chief economist, currently MIT Professor of Finance Deborah Lucas who was called by the U.S. President in 2009 to serve in a leadership role at CBO. CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf, a Harvard Ph.D. economist, agreed that such writings lacked knowledge of economics and poor communication skills for not understanding what it meant to remove them.

For those unfamiliar, CBO is a small federal agency that scores (produces cost estimates) Congress’s bills and can make or break them with its scoring. CBO’s panel of economic advisors includes Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, former Federal Reserve economists, and distinguished economists from academia who are or were former scholars of the Federal Reserve.

Closure to the Congressional Inquiry

After over a year of congressional inquiry, my story was first made public in the Wall Street Journal, “Congress’s Number Cruncher Comes Under Fire,” (Feb. 2, 2012) what the Journal allowed the public to know. When the true nature of the issues would not come out, I was stunned that the congressional inquiry led by Senator Grassley, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also declined to release my letter to the public to expose the issues. This happened during the week the New York Attorney’s General announced the lawsuit against MERS, but that too went silent a few days after the nationwide foreclosure settlement. All understood the ramifications of the NY AG lawsuit against MERS. Continue reading